This low budget movie tackles
the story of the infamous Boston Strangler and the mysteries that have
always surrounded the case. The story is told from the perspective
of the detective assigned to get an official confession from Albert
DeSalvo, who had confessed to a cellmate. DeSalvo is happy to
give the detective a detailed confession, but the detective senses something
isn’t right. He begins to investigate the case and begins to
realize that none of the eyewitness can identify DeSalvo and that there
isn’t any physical evidence linking him to the case. When a
psychiatrist mentions to him that DeSalvo has a near photographic memory
the detective begins to wonder if perhaps DeSalvo has confessed to the
notorious crime for the recognition it would garner him. But the
powers that be want nothing to do with a Strangler that is still on
the loose, so they suggest that the detective accept the confession
and submit his report. The movie then jumps to the future a few
years later after DeSalvo has been identified as the Strangler (but
was actually never convicted because he was already serving a life sentence
for another crime). Then the movie jumps forward again to the
early 80s when it is announced that DNA evidence has confirmed that
in at least one Strangler killing DeSalvo couldn’t of been guilty.
I’m not a big fan of these
true crime movies, so I really didn’t look forward to sitting down
to watch this movie. I can’t say that I thought this was a good
movie, but it was better than I thought it was going to be. Most
of the story occurs in an interview room where the detective speaks
to DeSalvo, while the crimes are shown in vague recreations. This
is clever because the movie is trying to convince the audience that
DeSalvo is imagining the crimes and didn’t actually commit them.
While the story is extremely slow at points the movie still manages
to be interesting. Also in spite of a few rough spots where the
acting is wooden the cast does a decent job for the most part.
The first thing that I noticed
when I popped the DVD of the Boston Strangler in was how great the movie
looked. The movie was clearly shot on a nice digital camera by
someone who knows how to light a scene and frame a shot. Unfortunately
whoever was in charge of the music did a really terrible job.
The musical queues are intrusive and loud. The music in a film
should help set the mood not continually get in the way. I should
also mention that in spite of a couple of on camera killings this movie
is bloodless, and has no real special effects to speak of.
The Boston Strangler is an
interesting, if not exciting movie. If you are interested in true
crime then you may check this one out. But be warned this isn’t
a horror film.